Mehmet Tatlici, one of three sons of late Mehmet Salih Tatlici’s first marriage that he had with his close relative (cousin), nowadays remains on the agenda with news in the media about him. It is now said that Mehmet Tatlici who is said to have lawsuits opened against him has used different signatures on his declarations before public authorities.
It has been revealed that Mehmet Tatlici who files criminal complaints against the second wife of his late father’s and his brother from the same father which include unjustified and unlawful accusations with the philosophy “mud-slinging” and sends the applications comprising these unjustified accusations to the utmost authorities of the state has used DIFFERENT SIGNATURES on these documents.
14 UNJUSTIFIED AND UNLAWFUL CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS OF MEHMET TATLICI HAS BEEN REJECTED ON LACT OF GROUNDS FOR LEGAL ACTIONS
This very “dutiful” child who requested the balance of the bank accounts of his late father with a facsimile sent to the bank before the funeral prayers of his late father had been performed, and ran to the courts for an action for making the inventory of the estate before the 40th day prayers of his father (see relevant news), has, as known, filed directly and indirectly 14 criminal complaints against Nurten Tatlici, the second wife of his father in illness and health for 43 years and Ugur Tatlici, his brother from the same father who was born from this marriage and all these complaints were decided by judges and district attorneys whether due to lack of grounds for legal action or resulted in rejection (see relevant news).
LEGAL ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST MEHMET TATLICI FOR SLANDER WITH THE REQUEST OF 16 YEARS OF JAIL CONVICTION
Due to all these unjustified and unlawful criminal complaints a legal action has been taken against Mehmet Tatlici with the request of 16 years of conviction for slander. This lawsuit is still continuing.
Besides, Mehmet Tatlici continued his accusations against the second wife of his late father and his youngest brother from the same father by sending letters with untrue accusations to public authorities, including the highest public authority of the country which is the President of the Republic of Turkey.
MEHMET TATLICI USED A FALSE SIGNATURE IN HIS LETTER CONTAINING BASELESS AND UNSUPPORTED ACCUSATIONS WRITTEN TO THE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE.
The application sent by Mehmet Tatlici on 24th May, 2011 to President Abdullah Gül, containing groundless accusations is an example for that. In this application Mehmet Tatlici declared that Ottoman Sultan, Suleiman the Magnificent’s Edict which he claimed to be a part of the collection of his late father, and other historical artworks were lost or have been smuggled, and that Nurten Tatlici, the second wife of his father, and Ugur Tatlici, his brother were responsible for this. He filed a criminal complaint with the same accusation at The Chief Public Prosecutor, but the Prosecutor rejected this application due to lack of grounds. (For detailed information please see the news: “Mehmet Tatlıcı’dan Muhteşem (!) İftira…”
WHICH IS MEHMET TATLICI’S REAL SIGNATURE?
Mehmet Tatlici is continuing to play this game with the “mud-slinging” cunningness, but every time he “makes a faux pas”. There is another very important matter in the application sent to the President: the signature of Mehmet Tatlici under this application… It may be clearly seen that this signature is quiet different from those officially filed at the Notary Public and used by him for other official documents.
WHAT IS THE REAL GOAL OF MEHMET TATLICI IN USING FALSE SIGNATURES?
Is it possible that Mehmet Tatlici sends these applications which include unjustified claims and accusations which unnecessarily occupy all public authorities up to the highest authorities of this country with his mind of “mud-slinging” which he loves very much, with such false signatures, so that they cannot cause him any problems afterwards? Does he intent to say that “these signature does not belong to me; look, this is my real signature” when he faces problems?
Considering the documents annexed with the different signatures of Mehmet Tatlici’s, the difference between the signatures may be clearly seen.
We leave the interpretation thereof to the readers of the Tatlici Gerçekleri news web site (Tatlici Facts) and the public.