True Colors Surfaced

mehmet_tatlici_simdi_de_masa_sandalyeye_goz_dikti_h242.jpg

The deceased businessman Mehmet Salih Tatlıcı’s one of the sons, Mehmet Tatlici who was born of his first wife with whom he had made a kin marriage, draw reactions of his family by giving power of attorney to his lawyers for the prosecution of inheritance cases 3 weeks before his father passed away as he was still struggling for his life at the hospital. 

WHAT KIND OF SON AND BROTHER IS MEHMET TATLICI?

Mehmet Tatiıci was in such a hurry to reach his father’s inheritance that he had already applied to court for the certificate of inheritance 2 days after his father’s death, namely before his funeral ceremony.

Mehmet Tatlici, who didn’t take the trouble of attending neither seventh nor fortieth day requiems on behalf of his father, even for keeping up the appearances, started to make consecutive denunciations with groundless allegations against some of his employees who had no relation to the case along with his father’s second wife Nurten and his youngest son Uğur Tatlıcı, just after his father’s death systematically as if it was preplanned.

ALL OF MEHMET TATLICI’S GROUNDLESS ALLEGATIONS HAVE BEEN DISMISSED…

Having realized that the allegations were groundless and merely resulted from inheritance dispute, Prosecution offices started to give verdicts of dismissal one after another in favor of Nurten and Uğur Tatlıcı with regard to these allegations.

Here are Mehmet Tatlici’s ineffective allegations with the intention of ‘‘intimidating’’ Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı during the inheritance dispute which kept judicial authorities occupied for nothing:

İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no 2009/68314 
Petitor                                 : Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspects                             : Nurten Tatlıcı, Uğur Tatlıcı and others
Accusation                        : Robbery, Abusing trust
Result                                  : Decision of no additional prosecution
Date of the Verdict         : 01/08/2011

Beykoz Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2011/3420  
Petitor                                 : Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspects                             : E.B, Uğur Tatlıcı and others
Accusation                        :  violation of law no 5846, violation of law no 2863
Result                                  :  Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2011/3647
Date of the Verdict         : 07/10/2011

Serik Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2010/4034
Petitor                                 : Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspects                             : Uğur Tatlıcı, E.B, Nurten Tatlıcı, Barcelo Turizm Otelcilik Ltd. Şti. Hotel Manager
Accusation                        : violation of law no 2863, Abusing trust
Result                                  :  Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2011/377
Date of the Verdict         : 10/03/2011

Şişli Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2011/5495 
Petitor                                 : Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspects                             :  Nurten Tatlıcı, Uğur Tatlıcı
Accusation                        :  Abusing trust by way of service
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2011/7216
Date of the Verdict         : 12/04/2011

Antalya Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2011/3303  
Petitor                                 : Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspects                             : Uğur Tatlıcı, E.B
Accusation                        :  violation of Decree with Power of Law no 556 ( Trademark Infringement)
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2011/13335
Date of the Verdict         : 20/04/2011

İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2011/1812  
Petitor                                 : Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspect                               :  Uğur Tatlıcı
Accusation                        : Trademark infringement
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2011/49529
Date of the Verdict         : 14/10/2011

İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2011/172030 
Petitor                                 :  Mehmet Tatlıcı
Suspects                             : Nurten Tatlıcı, Uğur Tatlıcı, E.B, Murat Yüce, Bülent Gültekin
Accusation                        :  Abusing trust, Violation of Law No 2863
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution (Decision is validated by the rejection of the objection made against the decision.)
Verdict No                         : 2012/52385
Date of the verdict          : 02.10.2012

And here are the decisions of non-prosecution taken with regard to the denunciations made by the people who went to bear testimony simultaneously with Mehmet Tatlici ‘‘heaven knows why’’, made denunciations against Uğur and Nurten Tatlıcı on the same dates, represented by the same lawyers, presented evidence to the prosecutor’s office as if they are petitors in spite of being witness:

İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2012/81902  
Petitor                                 : Mustafa Özgün
Suspects                             : Nurten Tatlıcı, Uğur Tatlıcı
Accusation                        : Injury
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2012/36673
Date of the verdict          : 20/06/2012

Şişli Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2009/63597 
Petitor                                 : Hüseyin Kabakçı
Suspect                               : E.B
Accusation                        : Insult, threat
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                          : 2010/22507
Date of the verdict          : 26/10/2010

Şişli Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Inquiry no   2009/62670  
Petitors                               : Mustafa Özgün, Murat Yüce
Suspects                             : E.B, Uğur Tatlıcı and others
Accusation                        : Violation of workplace privacy
Result                                  : Decision of Non-prosecution
Verdict No                         : 2011/526
Date of the verdict          : 07/01/2011

Gerçekler

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

scroll to top